Alignment Explorer

Find people. Compare them.
Know who's worth your time.

Upload the applicants you already have, or let it find people who never applied. Either way, every candidate gets the same structured evaluation so you can compare them side by side, with the reasoning behind every call. Sourced candidates have thinner evidence than uploaded resumes. Alignment Explorer tells you exactly where the read is confident and where it isn't.

Two ways in

Same evaluation, whether they applied or not.

Screen your applicants

Upload resumes in bulk

Each gets a structured evaluation: why they fit, where the risks are, and what to check. Full resume data means deep evidence and high-confidence reads.

Find people who never applied

Describe the role and search

Sourced profiles have sparser information, so evidence is thinner. Alignment Explorer flags exactly where the gaps are, so you know what to verify before you reach out.

One shortlist, apples to apples. Same framework whether they came to you or you found them.

How it explores the talent landscape

Progressive search, not a keyword dump.

Instead of running one broad query and hoping, Alignment Explorer searches in three progressively wider passes. You see results at every stage, not just at the end.

Comprehensive
Expanded
Focused
Start here

Coverage indicates how much of the potential search space has been explored

01

Focused

High-precision queries with top-priority dimensions. Surfaces strong matches quickly so you have something to work with immediately.

02

Expanded

Activates adjacent titles, domains, and seniority variants. Discovers less obvious but valuable candidates who wouldn't surface in a keyword search.

03

Comprehensive

Exhaustive search of the remaining query space. Catches hidden gems and edge cases so you know the landscape has been fully explored.

How it evaluates

Four signals, not one score.

Every candidate is read across four dimensions. When the evidence is strong, you see it. When it's thin, you see that too.

Role Fit

How the evidence maps to what the role actually needs. Beyond keywords: functional overlap, scope, and maturity level.

Engagement

Signs they'd be open to a conversation right now. Recent activity, career trajectory, and personalization hooks for your outreach.

Availability

Whether a move looks likely, and when it doesn't. Flags consulting intent, recent transitions, and openness indicators.

Evidence Confidence

How much of the read is verified versus inferred. Uploaded resumes yield high confidence. Sourced profiles may yield medium or low. You always know the difference.

What you get

Every candidate arrives as a reasoned case.

Not a row in a spreadsheet. Each candidate card tells you why they fit, where the risks are, and what to ask before you talk.

MR
Maya R.
FOUNDING ENGINEER · APPLIED AI
Top priority

Applied AI engineer with 4 years shipping LLM systems in healthcare. Built evaluation pipelines end-to-end, from data collection to production deployment. Strong systems instinct, lighter on customer-facing work.

Why this candidate
  • Shipped production LLM evaluation pipelines at a Series-B health-AI startup.
  • Maps to your real need: applied AI plus systems, not research alone.
Risks & gaps
  • No evidence of customer-facing work. Verify if this is the integrations role.
What to check
  • Papers show research; production scale is unconfirmed. Ask for a system she took to prod.
Role Fit8.6
High confidence
Engagement7.2
Medium confidence
AvailabilityUnclear
Low signal
Evidence6.9
Medium confidence
Outreach pack included

Personalization hooks, smart questions for the conversation, and a suggested opening grounded in what the evaluation actually found.

Compare candidates

Side by side, on the same dimensions.

No other tool lets you compare sourced and screened candidates on the same signals, with the reasoning visible. This isn't a list. It's a decision framework.

CandidateRole FitEngagementAvailabilityEvidenceRating
MR
Maya R.
Applied AI
8.67.22.46.9Top priority
JL
James L.
ML Engineer
7.46.88.17.2Strong match
SP
Sara P.
AI Research
6.25.59.05.8Moderate

Sample comparison · actual evaluations include reasoning and risk flags for each candidate

See your shortlist before your next interview.

Transparent pricing · no seats or minimums · candidates treated with clarity and respect.